Can I own a gun if I was convicted of a Felony?
A convicted felon can own a gun if the conviction was based on a nonviolent offense.

Block Party: DWI Nondisclosure in Texas
Recently the Governor signed H.B. No. 3016 allowing those convicted of first time DWIs to have their record non-disclosed (blocked) provided certain criteria is met. The DWI nondisclosure law becomes effective September 1, 2017 and applies retroactively.
DWI Nondisclosure Laws: Blocking a DWI Conviction
I. DWI NONDISCLOSURE – RETROACTIVE:
The new section applies to DWIs convictions both before and after September 1, 2017.
Sec. 411.0716. APPLICABILITY OF SUBCHAPTER. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), this subchapter applies to the issuance of an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information for an offense committed before, on, or after September 1, 2017.
II. DWI NONDISCLOSURE – PROBATION:
DWI nondisclosure if a person plead guilty and received probation.
Sec. 411.0731. PROCEDURE FOR COMMUNITY SUPERVISION FOLLOWING CONVICTION; CERTAIN DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED CONVICTIONS. (a) This section applies only to a person placed on community supervision under Chapter 42A, Code of Criminal Procedure:
(1) following a conviction of an offense under Section 49.04, Penal Code, other than an offense punishable under Subsection (d) of that section; and
• “…other than an offense punishable under subsection (d)” means a DWI with a breath alcohol level of 0.15 or more and punished as a Class A misdemeanor. So those convicted of a DWI with a breath or blood sample at 0.15 or more are not eligible for a nondisclosure.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter or Subchapter F, a person described by Subsection (a) whose community supervision is not revoked and who completes the period of community supervision, including any term of confinement imposed and payment of all fines, costs, and restitution imposed, may petition the court that placed the person on community supervision for an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information under this section if the person:
• A person must successfully complete the probation and pay all fines and costs.
(1) satisfies the requirements of this section and Section 411.074; and
(2) has never been previously convicted of or placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for another offense other than a traffic offense that is punishable by fine only.
• A person must not have any prior criminal history other than traffic offenses.
(c) A petition for an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information filed under this section must include evidence that the person is entitled to file the petition.
(d) Except as provided by Subsection (e), after notice to the state, an opportunity for a hearing, and a determination that the person is entitled to file the petition and issuance of an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information is in the best interest of justice, the court shall issue an order prohibiting criminal justice agencies from disclosing to the public criminal history record information related to the offense giving rise to the community supervision.
(e) A court may not issue an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information under this section if the attorney representing the state presents evidence sufficient to the court demonstrating that the commission of the offense for which the order is sought resulted in a motor vehicle accident involving another person, including a passenger in a motor vehicle operated by the person seeking the order of nondisclosure.
• There must be no evidence of an accident with another person. The law seems to allow for single car accidents as long as there were not any passengers.
(f) A person may petition the court that placed the person on community supervision for an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information under this section only on or after:
(1) the second anniversary of the date of completion of the community supervision, if the person successfully complied with a condition of community supervision that, for a period of not less than six months, restricted the person’s operation of a motor vehicle to a motor vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device; or
(2) the fifth anniversary of the date of completion of the community supervision, if the court that placed the person on community supervision did not order the person to comply with a condition of community supervision described by Subdivision (1) for the period described by that subdivision.
• Time Requirements: 2 years from the date probation is completed if an interlock was ordered for at least six months and 5 years from the date probation is completed if there was no interlock ordered for at least six months.
III. DWI NONDISCLOSURE – CONVICTION:
DWI nondisclosure after pleading guilty to the DWI and receiving days in jail.
• Same requirements as above other than the waiting period is 3 years and 5 years respectively.
Sec. 411.0736. PROCEDURE FOR CONVICTION; CERTAIN DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED CONVICTIONS. (a) This section applies only to a person who:
(1) is convicted of an offense under Section 49.04, Penal Code, other than an offense punishable under Subsection (d) of that section; and
(2) is not eligible for an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information under Section 411.0731.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this subchapter or Subchapter F, a person described by Subsection (a) who completes the person’s sentence, including any term of confinement imposed and payment of all fines, costs, and restitution imposed, may petition the court that imposed the sentence for an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information under this section if the person:
(1) satisfies the requirements of this section and Section 411.074; and
(2) has never been previously convicted of or placed on deferred adjudication community supervision for another offense other than a traffic offense that is punishable by fine only.
(c) A petition for an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information filed under this section must include evidence that the person is entitled to file the petition.
(d) Except as provided by Subsection (e), after notice to the state, an opportunity for a hearing, and a determination that the person is entitled to file the petition and issuance of an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information is in the best interest of justice, the court shall issue an order prohibiting criminal justice agencies from disclosing to the public criminal history record information related to the offense for which the person was convicted.
(e) A court may not issue an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information under this section if the attorney representing the state presents evidence sufficient to the court demonstrating that the commission of the offense for which the order is sought resulted in a motor vehicle accident involving another person, including a passenger in a motor vehicle operated by the person seeking the order of nondisclosure.
(f) A person may petition the court that imposed the sentence for an order of nondisclosure of criminal history record information under this section on or after:
(1) the third anniversary of the date of completion of the person’s sentence, if the person successfully complied with a condition of the sentence that, for a period of not less than six months, restricted the person’s operation of a motor vehicle to a motor vehicle equipped with an ignition interlock device; or
(2) the fifth anniversary of the date of completion of the person’s sentence, if the court that imposed the sentence did not order the person to comply with a condition described by Subdivision (1) for the period described by that subdivision.
Overall this DWI nondisclosure law is a huge step in clearing those people who maybe made one mistake and have already served their punishment.
Sometimes When You Win. . . Exonerations and Criminal Defense.
In the 1992 basketball film White Men Can’t Jump, it was explained:
Sometimes when you win, you really lose and sometimes when you lose, you really win and sometimes when you win or lose, you actually tie, and sometimes when you tie, you actually win or lose.
Make Sense?
Neither does the state of our Criminal Justice System.
Sometimes When You Win…
The National Registry of Exonerations Report revealed a record (get used to this word) number of United States exonerations in 2015: 149 exonerations in fact, with five exonerations coming straight outta death row. Of the 149 exonerations, wrongfully convicted persons served on average about 14-and-a-half years in prison.
Crime Breakdown:
Homicide: 58 or 39 % (new record)
Drug Cases: 51 or 34% (42 or 82% of the drug exonerations came from Clutch City, Texas)
Sexual Assault: 15 or 10%
…You Actually Lose:
Why are there so many exonerations? Why are people averaging 14 ½ years in prison for something they did not do? Why since 2011 have exonerations nearly doubled? Is it the criminal defense attorneys? The prosecutors? The judges?
The answer lies in the disconcerting reasons below (exonerations were based on either one or a combination of).
Official Misconduct: 65 or 44% (a new record)
Guilty Pleas 65 or 44% (another new record)
False Confessions 27 or 18% (and another new record)
No-Crime Cases: 75 or 50%
DNA: 26 or 17%
Note: Not accounted for, but an often cited reason for wrongful convictions is mistaken identity.
Official Misconduct:
There’s gonna be some stuff you gonna see
that’s gonna make it hard to smile in the future.
With nearly half of the exonerations coming from Houston, you don’t have to look very far to find shattered oaths littered by those sworn to protect and serve.
Look at the court’s findings in the David Temple case listing 36 instances of prosecutorial misconduct. Check out the Joseph Salazar case accused of attempting to disarm a peace officer, before criminal defense attorneys subpoenaed video that proved otherwise. Official misconduct isn’t just Houston’s problem, wrongdoing can be found across the country. Official misconduct is particularly troubling given the role authority figures play in the system. These are the very people at the heart of justice. The very people who have the power and authority to ensure the truth is revealed. Yet, with at least three exonerations per week it is clear some officials have lost sight of their professional duties.
Guilty Pleas:
Why would someone plead guilty to a crime he didn’t commit? From the outside, it seems impossible. From the inside, it is a different story. Especially, for example, from the inside of jail under FBI Investigation. The justice system is a money system. If you don’t have the bank roll to bond out of jail or defend your case, a “deal” can put you back on the job and with your family. While the intentions at this stage may not be as malicious as above, innocent people are still stuck in prisons and with permanent convictions.
No Crime:
What? Huh?
How could someone be convicted of something that is not a crime?
A quick guilty plea for a low-level drug cases where subsequent lab results reveal otherwise is such an example. 51 wrongfully convicted drug cases were exonerated last year in Houston alone.
Convictions secured by “junk science” like Cameron Willingham’s arson accusation is another. Overall jurors want to do the right things. They see a well-dressed, well-spoken, so-called government expert explaining “junk science” and it sounds believable. The experts of the unsinkable ship, Titanic, sounded believable too. “Junk science” has become a “fly in the ear” for many types of criminal offenses.
False Confessions:
People often find it difficult to believe someone would admit to a crime they did not commit. Unfortunately false confession can and do happen. Police “tunnel vision”, trained interrogation techniques, twisted words, lengthy interviews, and overmatched suspects are some of the many reasons false confessions occur. One exonerated case even involved police torture.
Still Work To Be Done
While a few major cities, including Houston, have deployed Conviction Integrity Units designed to prevent, identify and correct false convictions, there is still much work to be done. The growing number of exonerations fail to account for low-level offenders lacking the means, determination or desperation to prove their innocence. While they may not be facing death or lengthy prison sentences, the collateral consequences of a conviction carry a heavy weight. Until those with the ability to make changes for the betterment of the system do so, these flaws will remain. Criminal defense attorneys, prosecutors, and judges must demand better. So sure, it is a great that falsely accused persons are being freed at a record rate, but they shouldn’t have been there in the first place. In other words, sometimes when you win, you really lose.
Cleaning your Record.
POSTED BY: ADAMO / ADAMO
In our line of work there is no greater satisfaction than hearing a prosecutor say a case has been “dismissed” or a jury saying “not guilty”.
The battle however does not end in the courtroom. A dismissal or not guilty is only the first part of clearing your name.
In this “age of information” a non-expunged dismissal or not guilty is no better than a conviction for purposes of a person’s record. Failing to take advantage of erasing or sealing your records will result in unwanted explanations with employers, landlords, cops, and anyone with access to a computer.
So let’s break it down.
WHAT IS A “CRIMINAL RECORD?
A record is the collection of public information. A criminal record will show the cause number of your case/s, the offense charged, your name, and the disposition (i.e. final result). See Example:
Case (Cause)Number |
Style
|
File Date | Court |
Status |
Type of Action/Offense |
1313131313 CRIMINAL-Complete (C) | The State of Texas vs. Walter White (SPN: XXXXXXX) (DOB: 00/00/0000 | 00/00/00 | 17 | Defendant:Disposed (D)Disposition:Dismissed (DISM) |
OFFENSE CHARGED |
WHO MAINTAINS THE RECORDS?
The Department of Public Safety (DPS) is the “hub” for all criminal history information collected in the state of Texas. Arrests and case related information are reported to the Texas Crime Information center maintained by DPS. Additionally, either the original reporting agency or DPS will pass along the information to the National Crime Information Center overseen by the FBI.
WHO HAS ACCESS TO THE RECORDS?
These records are available to the general public via open records requests and online portals of court record information (i.e. District Clerk Websites). The records are sold to private vendors of criminal history record information, private background check companies, mug-shot websites and anyone else willing to spend a little money. Officers and district attorneys have access to this information as well.
IS AN EXPUNCTION AND NON-DISCLOSURE THE SAME?
This will be explained in greater detail below. The only consistency is they are both remedies limiting access to criminal history/record information.
IS THERE ANYTHING I CAN DO TO ASSIST?
Obtain your secure criminal history from DPS. This will help us to identify your eligibility for either an expunction or non-disclosure.
Use this link to obtain your criminal history: https://records.txdps.state.tx.us/DpsWebsite/CriminalHistory/About.aspx
EXPUNCTION
OKAY, I GET IT. AM I ELIGIBLE FOR AN EXPUNCTION?
Expunctions are governed by Tex. Code Crim Proc. Art. 55.01.
Generally…
YOU ARE ELIGIBLE IF: | YOU ARE NOT ELIGIBLE IF: |
Acquittal (i.e. not guilty verdict). | You received court ordered community supervision under Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 42.12 (i.e. deferred adjudication or probation), unless the offense was a Class C Misdemeanor. |
If you have been acquitted of an offense but convicted or remain subject to prosecution for at least one other offense. Also known as the criminal episode exception. | |
Unfiled Cases. If you were arrested but no charges have been filed. | The records relate to an arrest/warrant for a probation violation. |
Successful Completion of Pretrial Intervention or Diversion. | The records relate to the suspension of a driver’s license. |
Posthumous expunction. Where a close relative of the deceased where the defendant was acquitted, pardoned, or found actually innocent. | The records of financial transactions. |
Bail – Jumping. | |
Acquitted on appeal by the court of appeals. | |
*The Statute of Limitations has run. |
PRACTICE TIP: Typically you are not eligible for an expunction until the statute of limitations has run, however more and more agencies are not opposing expunctions filed before that time. This is especially true with misdemeanor offenses.
I AM ELIGIBLE, HOW DOES THE EXPUNCTION PROCESS WORK?
Briefly, a petition for expunction is drafted and filed with the court. The court issues a hearing date. Any agencies in possession of records pertaining to your arrest are served and notified of the petition. Absent an objection an Agreed Order of Expunction can be signed and filed with the court. If a party objects a hearing will be heard. Once signed by the judge all agencies listed in the petition are ordered to destroy their records or return the records to the court to be destroyed. The order prohibits law enforcement and other state agencies from releasing, maintaining, disseminating or using the records for any purpose.
MY RECORDS HAVE BEEN EXPUNGED, IF I AM ASKED “HAVE I EVER BEEN ARRESTED”, HOW DO I ANSWER?
NO! You are granted the right to say “No” to the question, have you ever been arrested or charged with crime. You can also answer the question “Have you ever had a criminal charge expunged?” with a profound “NO”.
There is one exception.
If you are testifying under oath in a criminal proceeding. You can not say “No”, but can say “The matter in question has been expunged”. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Art. 55.03.
NON-DISCLOSURE
I AM NOT ELIGIBLE FOR AN EXPUNCTION, BUT MAY BE ELIGIBLE FOR A NON-DISCLOSURE. WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?
The primary difference is an expunction is the destruction or erasing of your records. A non-disclosure results in “sealing” your records. With a non-disclosure your records are blocked from the public. Law enforcement, district attorneys, certain state agencies and licensing boards still have access to the records.
I SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED DEFERRED ADJUDICATION, AM I ELIGIBLE FOR A NON-DISCLOSURE?
Non-Disclosures are governed by Tex. Gov’t Code Section 411.081.
Generally…
YOU ARE ELIGIBLE IF: | YOU ARE NOT ELIGIBLE IF: |
You have successfully completed deferred adjudication | You have been previously convicted or placed on deferred for:-An offense requiring registration as a sex offender;-Aggravated kidnapping;-Murder, Injury to a Child, Abandoning or Endangering a Child, Violation of a Protective Order, Stalking; or-An offense involving family violence |
You have been convicted or placed on deferred adjudication for any offense (not including Class C misdemeanors) during the term you were on deferred or within certain time periods. |
IT SEEMS I AM ELIGIBLE FOR A NON-DISCLOSURE. ARE THERE WAITING PERIODS?
OFFENSE | WAITING PERIOD |
Most Misdemeanors | Eligible for Non-Disclosure immediately upon successfully completing deferred adjudication. |
Certain Misdemeanors:-Kidnapping and Unlawful Restraint;-Sexual Offenses;-Assaultive Offenses;-Offenses against the family;-Disorderly conduct, obstructing, harassment, interference with a 911 call;-Weapons | Eligible for Non-Disclosure TWO YEARS after successfully completing deferred adjudication. |
Felonies | Eligible for Non-Disclosure FIVE YEARS after successfully completing deferred adjudication. |
PRACTICE TIP: The waiting periods apply to the offense for which you plead guilty to and were placed on deferred adjudication for, not the offense for which you were originally charged. For example: Walter White is arrested for Felony Drug Possession. His attorney, Saul, negotiates a plea bargain allowing Mr. White to plead guilty to misdemeanor drug possession and receive deferred adjudication. Upon the successful completion of deferred adjudication Mr. White is immediately eligible to non-disclose his record (as opposed to waiting five years).
HOW DOES THE PROCESS WORK?
A petition for non-disclosure is drafted and filed with the court. A hearing is set. If the court finds it is in the “best interest of justice” for the records to be sealed, the judge will sign the petition’s order requiring DPS to notify all law enforcement agencies, jails, other detention facilities, magistrates, courts, prosecuting attorneys, correctional facilities, central state depositories of criminal records, and other officials or agencies subject to the order of the pertinent records to be sealed.
MY RECORDS HAVE BEEN NON-DISCLOSED OR SEALED, IF I AM ASKED “HAVE I EVER BEEN ARRESTED”, HOW DO I ANSWER?
While you can not deny being arrested (as you can with an expunction), you do not have to disclose the arrest and prosecution in applications for employment.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Erasing (expunction) or sealing (non-disclosure) your records is absolutely essential to keep from reliving the day you were arrested. A clean slate can mean the difference between having a job, obtaining a license, having a place to live, or even traveling to another country. Take advantage of this immeasurable tool.
Case Dismissed,
Law Office of ADAMO / ADAMO